ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine has gained wide acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Worldwide lockdowns made this interface an indispensable one for patient care. Recent evidence suggests that urology patients were receptive to telemedicine;however, no systematic review has been done to date on andrology patients in particular and their perception of telemedicine. METHOD(S): Three electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until June 2022 for relevant articles. Two independent teams reviewed s and extracted data from the selected manuscripts. A meta-analysis was completed in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR Guidelines. For our study, we limited telemedicine to communication through videoconferencing or telephone encounters between patients and medical professionals. Positive response to telemedicine was defined as patients "wishing for telemedicine consultation", "preferring telemedicine over in person", "accepting the current telemedicine arrangement", "having needs addressed with teleconsultation", or "willingness to do a teleconsultation". RESULT(S): Of the 1128 retrieved s, 56 underwent fulltext review and 12 were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of >4021 cases. All 8 studies that assessed perception of andrology patients to telemedicine showed that most patients had "positive perception". Telemedicine was shown to save an average cost of $149-252/patient. Pooled analyses of positive response to telemedicine were 68.7% (95% CI = 49.4-83.1%, p=0.057) and of patients who recommended telemedicine were 65.1% (95% CI = 18.4-93.9%, p=0.577). 84.6% pooled proportion for recommending video compared to 38.9 % pooled proportion for recommending telephone practice, p=0.035. In the telephone-only encounters, 27.1% of patients preferred in-person visits as security and privacy of any mode of telecommunication were of concern. CONCLUSION(S): Most patients have a positive perception of telemedicine, particularly with videoconferencing and less so with telephone visits. Telemedicine will plausibly continue to be integral in andrology practice.